W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > July 2014

Re: ticket for fixing up translation information

From: Jen Simmons <jen@jensimmons.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:14:59 -0400
Message-ID: <CAB0bRKOj++fy7ds_Q3034=EEjPtiqjpZn9Bo-6+X5WAfMaRy0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
Cc: List WebPlatform public <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>
> P.S. To Jen.  Are you aware of the way-too-much-whitespace issue when in
> tickets and comments?  Maybe worth another ticket about fixing up the
> project tracker CSS?


Yes. It's driving me a bit crazy too, but I think it's such a low,
low priority, it's not worth making a ticket for it. It'll take days to get
access to the CSS to make even a small change. Not worth it.

Jen Simmons
designer, consultant and speaker
host of The Web Ahead
jensimmons.com
5by5.tv/webahead
twitter: jensimmons <http://twitter.com/jensimmons>



On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Amelia Bellamy-Royds <
amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com> wrote:

> I made a separate story ticket for discussing the appropriate URL for a
> translation, which should also encompass related issues about how to
> search/filter for articles in a given language:
> http://project.webplatform.org/content/issues/113
>
> (This is separate from Jen's ticket, issue #111, which focuses on
> improving the instructions and help information for translators.)
>
> In line with the effort to move project management from the email list to
> the project tracker, further discussion should go on the appropriate
> tickets.  That way, all the ideas about each problem will be in one place,
> not split between multiple email threads and wiki pages and intersecting
> with other discussions.
>
> P.S. To Jen.  Are you aware of the way-too-much-whitespace issue when in
> tickets and comments?  Maybe worth another ticket about fixing up the
> project tracker CSS?
>
> AmeliaBR
>
>
> On 31 July 2014 11:13, Renoir Boulanger <renoir@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> See inline
>> --
>>
>> On July 31, 2014 12:30:18 PM EDT, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >I remember we had a long discussion
>> ><
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webplatform/2012Dec/0049.html>
>> >without a definite outcome regarding the way we implement translations.
>> >Some people were in favor of the wiki/dom/fr (for the French version of
>> >wiki/dom), I (and I think others) was against that.
>>
>> I can see why, listing subpages and seeing translations is strange.
>>
>> >I think the unspoken conclusion was
>> >that we keep it this way (wiki/dom/fr)
>> >for now, until we know more or something.
>> >
>> >My preference was to handle it similarly
>> > to the way Wikipedia handles it -
>> >using a sub domain for every language.
>> > fr.docs.webplatform.org for
>> >French,
>> >or similar.
>>
>> Right, I guess Ryan would have said that we'd have to generate as many
>> SSL certificates as there are languages.
>>
>> >Perhaps we should revisit it?
>>
>> Let's keep a note about that.
>>
>> Renoir
>> ~
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2014 19:15:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:02 UTC