W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > July 2014

Re: List of TODOs discovered during the QA Review

From: Jen Simmons <jen@jensimmons.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 17:03:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAB0bRKNY_LFkAN5Up2KUJG2Mae=4=hvfdq=HW7TosUpfZNyS9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
Cc: List WebPlatform public <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Amelia,
Let's talk tomorrow about adding these to the PM system. It'd be great for
you to do that soon.
Jen

Jen Simmons
designer, consultant and speaker
host of The Web Ahead
jensimmons.com
5by5.tv/webahead
twitter: jensimmons <http://twitter.com/jensimmons>



On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Amelia Bellamy-Royds <
amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I've been having various chats by email and IRC about quirks and
> questionable content discovered while assigning readiness states during the
> QA Sprint.  RenoirB suggested that I start an email thread to collect them
> all -- and suggestions on what to do with them -- in advance of the next
> community telcon.
>
> Here's what I have so far.  Please reply with any additions to this list
> or related commentary.
>
> 1. Glossary pages.  There are a number of pages in the top-level file path
> (like wiki/absolute_unit) that contain glossary entries.  These should all
> be grouped into a logical file path like wiki/glossary/absolute_unit, but
> there are probably other things that can be done to make the glossary as a
> whole more useful and organized.
>
> 2. Tables with listings of other pages.  We've discussed the problems with
> the formatting and content of listings in a separate thread [1], but this
> should move up the priority once the QASprint is over.  [1]:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webplatform/2014Jun/0014.html
>
> 3.  TEST: namespace pages.  With a completely separate test wiki, I don't
> think there is any use for the TEST: namespace, but the pages should be
> reviewed to determine if there is content that should be merged into the
> main wiki before they are deleted.
>
> 4.  Similarly, renoirB noted that there is a Meta: namespace which was
> used to back-up custom content before mass import of docs from MSDN.  These
> need to be reviewed and content merged into the main docs (perhaps this
> could be a DocSprints task?).
>
> 5.  Imported pages with no page templates / default forms.  There are a
> lot in the SVG pages I was going through, but there may be others.
>
> Any other quirky issues to add to this list?  Of course, you will have
> also discovered a lot of content-related TO-DOs, to address all the "Not
> Ready" and "In Progress" pages.  But for now, I'm mostly focusing on issues
> where a decision has to be made about what should be done.
>
> Best,
> Amelia BR
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 21:04:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:02 UTC