W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > July 2014

Re: -ms prefixed CSS properties??

From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 22:11:39 +0300
Message-ID: <CABc02_J5KUcWrnAYwcqNxn1Tc64KyDgSeofzhURhYWOLyLhNyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Brian J. Hong" <hong.brian.j@gmail.com>
Cc: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, Jen Simmons <jen@jensimmons.com>, List WebPlatform public <public-webplatform@w3.org>
(That means, you can rename/move it or create a new page with the same
content and attribution but without the prefix, if there is a standard API
that corresponds to the same - prefix less - name with the same purpose)


☆*PhistucK*


On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:10 PM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:

> Generally, yes. It is the same for any proprietary feature.
>
>
> ☆*PhistucK*
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Brian J. Hong <hong.brian.j@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Does that mean we should be marking the MSCSS Matrix Object proprietary
>> and a candidate for deletion as well? or is that separate?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  Yes, you’re correct. When we donated the content from MSDN, we donated
>>> everything we had, knowing that there was proprietary content in there that
>>> we need to weed out. Please mark these as candidates for deletion, and you
>>> should also feel free to alter or remove any text within a topic that is
>>> proprietary, unless it is pointing out different implementation behaviors
>>> or something like that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eliot
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* jensimmons@gmail.com [mailto:jensimmons@gmail.com] *On Behalf
>>> Of *Jen Simmons
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 3, 2014 10:16 AM
>>> *To:* List WebPlatform public
>>> *Subject:* -ms prefixed CSS properties??
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There are 19 pages in the CSS Docs for -ms prefixed properties.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Like this:
>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/ms-grid-row-align
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But that seems inconsistent. We don't have separate pages for all the
>>> other prefixes, right? Everything for CSS Grid should be on grid pages, not
>>> on separate (separately-alaphbetized) pages — yes?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm thinking these should be deleted or deprecated... but I'm not sure.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> They are:
>>>
>>> ms-grid-columns
>>>
>>> ms-grid-row
>>>
>>> ms-grid-row-align
>>>
>>> ms-grid-row-span
>>>
>>> ms-grid-rows
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-chaining
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-limit
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-limit-xMin
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-limit-xMax
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-yMax
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-limit-yMin
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-rails
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-snap-points-x
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-snap-points-y
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-snap-type
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-snap-x
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-snap-y
>>>
>>> ms-scroll-translation
>>>
>>> ms-touch-select
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Plus, MediaWiki problematically removes the dash, so the titles of these
>>> pages are themselves a mistake. It should be "-ms-grid-row" not
>>> "ms-grid-row". If we do have pages like these, we'll have to figure out
>>> what to do about the fact they are so misleading without the prefix dash.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   Jen Simmons
>>>
>>> designer, consultant and speaker
>>>
>>> host of The Web Ahead
>>>
>>> jensimmons.com
>>>
>>> 5by5.tv/webahead
>>>
>>> twitter: jensimmons <http://twitter.com/jensimmons>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 19:12:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:02 UTC