W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > September 2013

Re: We Need a Meeting!

From: Renoir Boulanger <renoir@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:54:24 -0400
Message-ID: <eo23wy8ymwv1oowtqg5lbi9d.1379609664272@email.android.com>
To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
Cc: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, public-webplatform@w3.org
Hello Richard

Sorry for the no followup and thanks for participating with us.

I also think it might be out of friday's meeting scope. 

But as Scott said, adding an issue in our issue tracker won't do harm.  I would also suggest you link the appropriate messages thread from the list archive.

One other thing is that we heavily rely on IRC too.  You can join #webplatform-site on freenode.

Regards


Renoir Boulanger | Developer operations engineer
W3C | webplatform.org

http://w3.org/people/#renoirbhttps://renoirboulanger.com  ✪  @renoirb
~

Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote:

>Well, I think the agenda is quite full, and I'm concerned that this issue is somewhat beyond the scope of the discussion. The immediate purpose of the meeting is to gain a sense of where the project currently stands and to raise any issues that may impede progress.
>
>
>For Richard's issue, I think the best way to approach this is by first filing an issue in our tracker.
>
>
>Richard, please create a new content issue here:
>
>
>http://project.webplatform.org/content/planning
>
>
>Add the issue under Unassigned issues.
>
>
>We can certainly put this on the agenda for discussion, but we may not get to it tomorrow.
>
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>~Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>Hi Richard.
>
>Apologies for missing your original mail. Yes, this is the correct list and this is the correct meeting to start the discussion. We do have a small team of people to implement changes to templates, but we should discuss this in the overall content discussion before implementing.
>
>Scott, can you add this item to the agenda? I know we're really packed for tomorrow; if we can't get to it this week, we can either discuss further in mail or take it up at the next meeting.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Eliot
>
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org]
>>Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 8:54 AM
>>To: public-webplatform@w3.org
>>Subject: Re: We Need a Meeting!
>>
>
>>I'm new to this list, so I don't know your procedures. Ten days ago, I sent the
>>following email, which attracted no response. Would it be a suitable topic for
>>discussion at your meeting?
>>
>>RI
>>
>>On 09/09/2013 14:36, Richard Ishida wrote:> Folks,  >  > I've been working
>>through the list of HTML elements and attributes  > putting in links to the i18n
>>resources we have, and have made a start on  > the CSS properties, etc. It
>>wasn't always obvious where to put those  > links - they are not really like the
>>other optional links that appear at  > the bottom of the page;
>>internationalization information is typically an  > essential part of the
>>information that content authors/developers need  > (as, of course, is WAI
>>info).
>> >
>> > I'd like to propose that the template for each page in the list of  > elements,
>>attributes, and properties, etc. include an additional  > section: Universal
>>Access.
>> >
>> > In this section we can add WAI, i18n and device independence tips, and  >
>>links to relevant materials.
>> >
>> > Is this the right list to make such suggestions? Who would take  > decisions
>>on that?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > RI
>
>
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 16:54:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:54 UTC