W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Please review WPDS blog post

From: Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:51:34 +0100
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE4B6F62.5374C%ameissne@adobe.com>
Good suggestions, thanks again. Edited & published!

Whoever owns @WebPlatform over Renoirs time off please send a tweet,
thanks.

http://blog.webplatform.org/2013/09/switzerland-doc-sprint-sets-some-new-re
cords/

*Jay




-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Organisation: W3C
Datum: KW 36 | Dienstag, 3. September 2013 10:34
An: Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>
Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, Renoir
Boulanger <renoir@w3.org>
Betreff: Re: Please review WPDS blog post

>Hi, Jay–
>
>Looks good! I say publish it.
>
>I did think of one more optional suggestion... you could link to the
>individual articles, so people can check them out immediately without
>searching:
>* 11 HTML element pages written: dl, dd, dt, s, del, ins, center, meter,
>button, a, script
>* 4 HTML attribute pages written: id, required, type, target
>* 2 API pages written: VibrationAPI, Canvas Tutorial
>
>(And shouldn't VibrationAPI be Vibration API?)
>
>Regards-
>-Doug
>
>On 9/3/13 4:18 AM, Andre Jay Meissner wrote:
>> Thanks all for your reviews, specifically @Doug for setting the missing
>> flag and pointing out the crazy 3rd person stuff that has been
>>introduced
>> before I set myself as the author... much better without that mention
>> anyway! :)= Edits are made based on the tweaks below, please give it a
>> final look so I can publish it today.
>>
>> Oh wait, weird!
>> http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=626&preview=1&_ppp=a4a382e9ec still shows
>> the outdated version, whereas using the WordPress "Preview"
>>functionality
>> previews the edits I have made. Hm. I tried dis/enabling it hoping it
>> generates a new public preview/URL, to no avail. @Renoir?
>>
>> (People with WP accounts, please review and approve! #ahrgh)
>>
>> Thanks, *Jay
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
>> Organisation: W3C
>> Datum: KW 36 | Dienstag, 3. September 2013 03:00
>> An: Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>
>> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> Betreff: Re: Please review WPDS blog post
>>
>>> Hi, Jay, Chris­
>>>
>>> On 9/2/13 12:04 PM, Andre Jay Meissner wrote:
>>>> Chris and me wrote a resume for the blog. Please review, as always it
>>>> needs two approvers please:
>>>> http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=626&preview=true
>>>
>>> This post (and Doc Sprint) looks great! Really good color.
>>>
>>> I suggest a couple of minor tweaks:
>>>
>>> * Does Andre Jay Meissner from Adobe always refer to himself in the 3rd
>>> person? :P I'm not sure how to fix this, other than to suggest "I (
>>> Andre Jay Meissner from Adobe) kicked off proceedings"... which also
>>> sounds weird. Oh, well.
>>>
>>> * "kicked off proceedings" -> "kicked off the proceedings"
>>>
>>> * stuck in: in American English (such as it is), this has a negative
>>> connotation, like they were forced to do this against their will (like,
>>> "stuck in traffic" or "stuck in school on a Spring day"). I think in
>>> British English, it means "to start doing something enthusiastically".
>>> Maybe "and jumped head-first in to a variety of tasks" or something?
>>>
>>> Thanks again for the Doc Sprint and the report!
>>>
>>> Regards-
>>> -Doug
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>  Schepers
>W3C Developer Relations Lead
>Project Coordinator for SVG, WebApps, Touch Events, and Audio
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2013 08:52:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:54 UTC