RE: Birthday blog post

I understand Alex’s concern about wasting our press engagement; however, I think that a blog post here is a good idea (with a few edits).

We blog (somewhat) regularly about events and milestones. And the press does not glom onto them as official press releases. If we do, indeed, lower the fanfare a tad and keep this long one of two things will happen. The press will either ignore it (most likely, given past behavior), or they will notice it and fill copy with it. This is not a big announcement, nor is there anything press worthy in it, with one exception: “Webplatform has been live for a year. What have they done?” Not a big story. If they do want to run the story, though, this provides the background. We should really make sure that at the end we say, “We will reach a milestone in the next 60 days, one that we are proud of and one which we will announce on the blog. Stay tuned….”

Overall, I like the post. The litany of accomplishments is good, accurate, and not overblown. The section headers could be toned down, but the structure and flow are really nice. Great job, Scott!

Consistency in the voice would be good, and switching to third person would be best, IMHO. From:
We’ve also developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties>.
To
The team developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties>.
Etc.

I’d love to be able to edit this, but I am really tied up today and tomorrow with the release of IE11 and Windows 8.1.

My 2 cents
Eliot

PS. One specific passage I had a question about was this one:

Thanks to the invaluable efforts of Dave Gash<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Dgash>, Mike Sierra<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Sierra>, Lance Leonard<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Lleonard>, and many others, we reorganized the API Reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis>, updating 9 imported documents and adding 13 new documents, in over 730 pages.

I’m not quite sure how to parse that.

From: Alex Komoroske [mailto:komoroske@google.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:28 AM
To: Julee
Cc: Eliot Graff; Andre Jay Meissner; Scott Rowe; public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK
Subject: Re: Birthday blog post

I realize my earlier comments may not have been clear.

My basic point boils down to: we get one free chance to engage tech press for an announcement around our birthday. We're close to having something meaty (CSS Properties), but we aren't there yet to have a big announcement. A "year in review" that is not positioned to grab press attention (like this post) is a great idea (and it's extremely well executed and exhaustively researched by Scott--many props). I just want to be careful about making this a "happy birthday" post that could accidentally engage the press and blow our one-free-announcement card.

Luckily, in my personal opinion it's easy to avoid accidental press pickup by softening the "birthday" language, and by keeping it long and in depth (so scratch that point in my earlier comments).

--Alex (the guy who apparently loves parentheticals) Komoroske



On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Julee <julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>> wrote:
Eliot:

As the keeper of the blog, what do you think? We talked last Friday about having a birthday post sooner rather than later, but I also see Alex's point. Would you please weigh in?

J
----------------------------
julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>
@adobejulee

From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com<mailto:komoroske@google.com>>
Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:44 AM
To: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com<mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>>
Cc: Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com<mailto:ameissne@adobe.com>>, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com<mailto:scottrowe@google.com>>, WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Birthday blog post

Thanks for writing this up, Scott! Overall it's well written and gives a lot of great shoutouts.

A few high-level comments:

  *   The post uses first person a few times, which seems a bit informal for an Official Announcement on the Official Blog. (Although it's possible I just have weird preferences--what do others think?)
  *   It's looooooooong. It's a great, in-depth overview of progress in the past year, but it might be too much for a general audience to read through.
  *   We had talked in the past about using the birthday timing for a more concerted marketing push. That implies to me that we might want to de-emphasize the one year birthday angle in this post so we can "save it" for a bigger push. One way to do that is to keep this post comprehensive (which is pretty inside baseball and won't be particularly interesting to press), and play down the "OMG it's our birthday" angle just slightly in the intro and title. Does that make sense? Is it a silly idea?
I haven't had a chance to leave specific, low-level comments.

--Alex

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:12 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com<mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>> wrote:
Oh, now I see there are two mentions - please, remove both of them (one is "Phistuk").

Thank you for trying. ;)


☆PhistucK

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:07 PM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com<mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>> wrote:
Please, remove my name from the post, I do not need any credit.
(It was pointing to the wrong link anyway)


☆PhistucK

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com<mailto:ameissne@adobe.com>> wrote:
Great work Scott! Minor spelling fix (good old "Doc Sprint" FTW!), already in. Wondered if we could add 2-3 more images, could just be a pic of the great Amsterdam cake and maybe the Doc Sprint logo or so. Also thanks for giving me good reason to finally pimp my user profile a bit! :)) *Jay


Von: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com<mailto:scottrowe@google.com>>
Datum: KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:29
An: "public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>" <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
Betreff: Birthday blog post
Neu gesendet von: "public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>" <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
Neu gesendet am: KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:30

Blog reviewers, please take a look at this draft:

http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=729&preview=1&_ppp=9c032ed7ef


Append your comments and suggestions to this thread.

Thanks!
~Scott

Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 16:54:01 UTC