W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Beta and Beyond

From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:21:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHZLcPq7bFAc_pmJaM0FB6zHvWYy3wwPzjsCYwKHaw_4+8dhBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julee <julee@adobe.com>
Cc: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Thanks Julee,

I removed the second "DOM Reference pages" under "Content items for later."
The distinction/stipulation about having URLs is sufficient as is, says I.




On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:

> Hi, Scott:
>
> Good point. It was my understanding that the Content project team would
> validate, flesh out, and recirculate a finalized list.
>
> So maybe do you want to fix the typo and add that distinction?
>
> Julee
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
>
> From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
> Date: Friday, March 22, 2013 5:20 PM
> To: julee <jburdeki@adobe.com>
> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, Doug
> Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Beta and Beyond
>
> hi all,
>
> I think that there is a typo under "Content items for later" where DOM
> reference pages are cited - both here and under "Content Items."
>
> My guess is that we won't have a complete DOM API reference, though
> meeting all of the goals for content is not unrealistic, but we should at
> least set the goal of having the pages organized in a coherent hierarchy
> delineated in the URLs.
>
> +Scott
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi, everyone:
>>
>> At today's community meeting we reviewed
>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Project_Status and, barring any
>> objections, we agreed to move ahead with it.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Julee
>> ----------------------------
>> julee@adobe.com
>> @adobejulee
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
>> Organization: W3C
>> Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:36 PM
>> To: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> Subject: Beta and Beyond
>> Resent-From: <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:37 PM
>>
>> >Hi, folks-
>> >
>> >Julee, Eliot, and I met on Friday to start to lock down our Beta
>> >requirements and schedule. The gist (which should surprise nobody) is
>> >that we will be making project for each "activity" in the project
>> >management system (Bug Genie)
>> >
>> >Our Beta criteria will be focused on Infrastructure, Content, and
>> >Community goals.
>> >
>> >We would like to establish a timeline for each project based on our
>> >community discussion evaluation of the time needed, so please help
>> >refine our rough notes here:
>> >
>> >http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Project_Status
>> >
>> >With a week or so, we hope to have several projects entered into
>> >project.webplatform.org, and we'll use that as a starting point for
>> >further refinements.
>> >
>> >Some criteria we want to meet may not be Beta... they may be later
>> >goals. We should still list them and keep track of them.
>> >
>> >Regards-
>> >-Doug
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 00:22:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:41 UTC