W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Organizing projects in project.webplatform.org

From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:20:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CANQy2y2AoziQgTei=RWzmLybv4rviY6sxXtFa3QAky+71=m-5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
This "deferred" system seems illogical. We can assign the issues to a
milestone, or leave them unassigned which can be the "deferred" status.
Having a separate project structure just for that is wasteful and confusing
imho. Either we go with a master project (assuming sub-projects actually
have a good UX) or we keep separated projects, as Bugzilla had components,
and tweak from there as we need. That keeps thing simple and
straightforward.


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote:

> Thanks, yes. Let's just keep it as WPD:Proposals then. Also, yes,
> sitemap/treasure hunt should be, um, interesting! :/
> +Scott
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Scott:
>>
>> Yes, I will resolve the Beta_Requirements<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Proposals/Beta_Requirements>
>> /WPD:Project_Status <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Project_Status> issue.
>> I'm not sure we'll need a beta requirements page on docs.* going forward,
>> because it'll be fully outlined with great visualization on project.*.
>>
>> As far as renaming WPD:Proposals to WPD:Projects: The original purpose
>> of WPD:Proposals was to allow anyone to post a proposal within our
>> namespace, and not have to go to github or google docs or wherever. It's
>> like a sketching area. I don't think we'll need a WPD:Projects area,
>> because as soon as a proposal is accepted, it, and all of it's related
>> issues, can move to project.*
>>
>> Regarding bundling these meta pages: I agree. I will be working on the
>> site map, so it'll be interesting to discover more pages!
>>
>> Makes sense?
>>
>> J
>> ----------------------------
>> julee@adobe.com
>> @adobejulee
>>
>> From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:21 PM
>> To: julee <julee@adobe.com>
>> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> Subject: Re: Organizing projects in project.webplatform.org
>>
>> Hi Julee,
>>
>> There are two documents that relate to the overall status of the project:
>>
>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Proposals/Beta_Requirements
>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Project_Status
>>
>> Could you resolve the differences between these and make one document?
>>
>> Also, I've been gathering various WPD: pages under either WPD:Community
>> or WPD:Proposals in an attempt to put some sanity into the organization of
>> these "meta pages." With a lack of navigation and search, it's awfully hard
>> to keep track of these if they are just created anywhere.
>>
>> Could you put the "Project_Status/Beta_Requirements" page under
>> WPD:Proposals?
>>
>> I was thinking of renaming WPD:Proposals to WPD:Projects; do you think
>> that's a good idea, too?
>>
>> +Scott
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, everyone:
>>>
>>> To help get project.webplatform.org finished and to get our beta work
>>> fully integrated[1], I've created a proposal for how we might set up
>>> projects:
>>>
>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Proposals/Organizing_projects
>>>
>>> I'll work with Garbee to see what we can actually do with The Bug Genie.
>>>
>>> Please let us know what you think.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> Julee
>>>
>>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Project_Status
>>>
>>> ----------------------------
>>> julee@adobe.com
>>> @adobejulee
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2013 18:20:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:40 UTC