W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Talk sub-domain and chat page.

From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:54:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CANQy2y3Dhn8J7ejUuLhF1FQPJyXmOmqQ2kMLWMUQp3ZTiz763g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Ok, Renoir is now the owner of the Infrastructure project.


On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi, Garbee, Renoir-
>
> Yes, Renoir should be owner of that project. Thanks for taking the
> initiative!
>
> Regards-
> -Doug
>
>
> On 7/30/13 5:42 PM, Jonathan Garbee wrote:
>
>> This is a great thing to do, the infrastructure section is best for most
>> of the stuff you will be doing it seems. So, that would be the area to
>> place it. I just went and made your account an admin and assigned you to
>> the developers and staff members groups.
>>
>> I'm going to assign you as the owner of that project once I get
>> confirmation from Doug and/or Ryan that it is OK to do so.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Renoir B. <renoirb@gmail.com
>> <mailto:renoirb@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Let's keep an issue in buggenie ("project...") assigned to me.
>>
>>     Actually, many issues should be assigned to me and anyway, I'll use
>>     buggenie  to maintain my task trail.
>>
>>     Is it ok?
>>
>>     -
>>     Renoir Boulanger
>>     Software & Frontend developer
>>     https://renoirboulanger.com/#**is <https://renoirboulanger.com/#is>
>>     ~
>>     ~
>>
>>     On Jul 30, 2013 5:32 PM, "Jonathan Garbee"
>>     <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com <mailto:jonathan.garbee@gmail.**com<jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>         Whoops, accidentally sent this just to Renoir. So, sending to
>>         the ML:
>>
>>         I just don't see a use for the subdomain anymore. If the a11y
>>         group is going to use q2a then that is fine (however it can't be
>>         plugged into the docs auth lest we want to reinvarnate the
>>         session bug. ) But, keeping it up just to use the chat page, not
>>         worth it imo.
>>
>>
>>         On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jonathan Garbee
>>         <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com <mailto:jonathan.garbee@gmail.**com<jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
>> >>
>>
>>         wrote:
>>
>>             I just don't see a use for the subdomain anymore. If the
>>             a11y group is going to use q2a then that is fine (however it
>>             can't be plugged into the docs auth lest we want to
>>             reinvarnate the session bug. ) But, keeping it up just to
>>             use the chat page, not worth it imo.
>>
>>             On Jul 30, 2013 5:13 PM, "Renoir B." <renoirb@gmail.com
>>             <mailto:renoirb@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                 I think we should still have it.
>>
>>                 Unless we have instances budget limitations already
>>                 running short.
>>
>>                 I would suggest to enable the feature within less than a
>>                 month after I worked on some improvements.
>>
>>                 During that time, I will have time spent to find the
>>                 bottlenecks and set some improvements, and ensure the
>>                 feature doesn't affect the rest of the site as the
>>                 analytics was doing.
>>
>>                 What do you think?
>>
>>                 *Renoir Boulanger*
>>                 Frontend & software developer
>>
>>                 *renoir*boulanger.com/#is
>>                 <https://renoirboulanger.com/#**is<https://renoirboulanger.com/#is>>
>> <-- vient d'ĂȘtre refait!
>>
>>                 ~
>>
>>
>>                 On 30 July 2013 16:31, Julee Burdekin
>>                 <jburdeki@adobe.com <mailto:jburdeki@adobe.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                     Hi, Garbee:
>>
>>                     Re: #1: It was discussed at a general meeting. Doug
>>                     was following up. So he can do that with the a11y
>>                     folks. Just wanted to make a note of that.
>>
>>                     That's cool that we have the webchat. And I
>>                     understand why we have to move it, and get rid of
>>                     talk. But now that I think about it, what about just
>>                     keeping Discussion and having it point to webchat?
>>                     Then, more folks would show up on the IRC and be in
>>                     the live stream of WPD life.
>>
>>                     What do others think?
>>
>>                     J
>>                     ----------------------------
>>                     julee@adobe.com <mailto:julee@adobe.com>
>>
>>                     @adobejulee
>>
>>                     From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com
>>                     <mailto:jonathan.garbee@gmail.**com<jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
>> >>
>>
>>                     Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:57 AM
>>
>>                     To: WebPlatform Public List
>>                     <public-webplatform@w3.org
>>                     <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.**org<public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> >>
>>
>>                     Subject: Re: Talk sub-domain and chat page.
>>
>>                     Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List
>>                     <public-webplatform@w3.org
>>                     <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.**org<public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> >>
>>
>>                     Resent-Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:57 AM
>>
>>                     For point one, I haven't seen any Mailing list
>>                     discussion about that (probably just lost in gmail
>>                     somewhere if it did occur) and I have only heard
>>                     some comments in IRC about it, so I have no clue on
>>                     the status of an a11y forum.
>>
>>                     We do have webchat functionality, with my improved
>>                     version [1] it includes a freenode webchat embed.
>>                     That is why it would be moved off the talk subdomain
>>                     onto www. To keep the infrastructure simpler.
>>
>>                     +1 to remove Discussion. That kind of thing should
>>                     be gotten to through the Community page.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                     On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Julee Burdekin
>>                     <jburdeki@adobe.com <mailto:jburdeki@adobe.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>                         Hi, Garbee:
>>
>>                         Please let me know if any of this is incorrect:
>>
>>                          1. Forums is down, due to technical
>>
>>                             difficulties. When we can put it back into
>>                             production is unknown. So we won't be
>>                             supporting an accessibility forum there as
>>                             we previously discussed until further notice.
>>                          2. We currently do not have IRC web chat
>>                             functionality on this site.
>>                          3. Since there's no forums and not web chat,
>>
>>                             for now, we're going to take down
>>                             talk.webplatform.org
>>                             <http://talk.webplatform.org> altogether.
>>                          4. Since there's no talk.webplatform.org
>>                             <http://talk.webplatform.org>, we should
>>
>>                             also remove the global nav "Discussion" from
>>                             everywhere:
>>                               * Www
>>                               * Docs
>>                               * Blog
>>                               * Project
>>
>>                         Thanks.
>>
>>                         Julee
>>                         ----------------------------
>>                         julee@adobe.com <mailto:julee@adobe.com>
>>
>>                         @adobejulee
>>
>>                         From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com
>>                         <mailto:jonathan.garbee@gmail.**com<jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
>> >>
>>
>>                         Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:44 AM
>>                         To: WebPlatform Public List
>>                         <public-webplatform@w3.org
>>                         <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.**org<public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> >>
>>
>>                         Subject: Talk sub-domain and chat page.
>>                         Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List
>>                         <public-webplatform@w3.org
>>                         <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.**org<public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> >>
>>
>>                         Resent-Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:44 AM
>>
>>                         The talk sub-domain no longer has a reason to
>>                         stick around. The only thing hosted there is the
>>                         defunct chat page. I think we should simply turn
>>                         off the talk subdomain and move the chat page
>>                         (with improvements [1]) to the primary www
>>                         domain. This will reduce the sub-domains that
>>                         need to be maintained and simplify management.
>>
>>                         Any issues going down this road?
>>
>>                         -Garbee
>>
>>
>>                         [1] http://jonathan.garbee.me/**chat/<http://jonathan.garbee.me/chat/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 23:55:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:53 UTC