W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Talk sub-domain and chat page.

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:52:50 -0400
Message-ID: <51F851D2.5080406@w3.org>
To: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
CC: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Hi, Garbee, Renoir-

Yes, Renoir should be owner of that project. Thanks for taking the 
initiative!

Regards-
-Doug

On 7/30/13 5:42 PM, Jonathan Garbee wrote:
> This is a great thing to do, the infrastructure section is best for most
> of the stuff you will be doing it seems. So, that would be the area to
> place it. I just went and made your account an admin and assigned you to
> the developers and staff members groups.
>
> I'm going to assign you as the owner of that project once I get
> confirmation from Doug and/or Ryan that it is OK to do so.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Renoir B. <renoirb@gmail.com
> <mailto:renoirb@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Let's keep an issue in buggenie ("project...") assigned to me.
>
>     Actually, many issues should be assigned to me and anyway, I'll use
>     buggenie  to maintain my task trail.
>
>     Is it ok?
>
>     -
>     Renoir Boulanger
>     Software & Frontend developer
>     https://renoirboulanger.com/#is
>     ~
>     ~
>
>     On Jul 30, 2013 5:32 PM, "Jonathan Garbee"
>     <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com <mailto:jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         Whoops, accidentally sent this just to Renoir. So, sending to
>         the ML:
>
>         I just don't see a use for the subdomain anymore. If the a11y
>         group is going to use q2a then that is fine (however it can't be
>         plugged into the docs auth lest we want to reinvarnate the
>         session bug. ) But, keeping it up just to use the chat page, not
>         worth it imo.
>
>
>         On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jonathan Garbee
>         <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com <mailto:jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>>
>         wrote:
>
>             I just don't see a use for the subdomain anymore. If the
>             a11y group is going to use q2a then that is fine (however it
>             can't be plugged into the docs auth lest we want to
>             reinvarnate the session bug. ) But, keeping it up just to
>             use the chat page, not worth it imo.
>
>             On Jul 30, 2013 5:13 PM, "Renoir B." <renoirb@gmail.com
>             <mailto:renoirb@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>                 I think we should still have it.
>
>                 Unless we have instances budget limitations already
>                 running short.
>
>                 I would suggest to enable the feature within less than a
>                 month after I worked on some improvements.
>
>                 During that time, I will have time spent to find the
>                 bottlenecks and set some improvements, and ensure the
>                 feature doesn't affect the rest of the site as the
>                 analytics was doing.
>
>                 What do you think?
>
>                 *Renoir Boulanger*
>                 Frontend & software developer
>
>                 *renoir*boulanger.com/#is
>                 <https://renoirboulanger.com/#is> <-- vient d'ĂȘtre refait!
>                 ~
>
>
>                 On 30 July 2013 16:31, Julee Burdekin
>                 <jburdeki@adobe.com <mailto:jburdeki@adobe.com>> wrote:
>
>                     Hi, Garbee:
>
>                     Re: #1: It was discussed at a general meeting. Doug
>                     was following up. So he can do that with the a11y
>                     folks. Just wanted to make a note of that.
>
>                     That's cool that we have the webchat. And I
>                     understand why we have to move it, and get rid of
>                     talk. But now that I think about it, what about just
>                     keeping Discussion and having it point to webchat?
>                     Then, more folks would show up on the IRC and be in
>                     the live stream of WPD life.
>
>                     What do others think?
>
>                     J
>                     ----------------------------
>                     julee@adobe.com <mailto:julee@adobe.com>
>                     @adobejulee
>
>                     From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com
>                     <mailto:jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>>
>                     Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:57 AM
>
>                     To: WebPlatform Public List
>                     <public-webplatform@w3.org
>                     <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
>                     Subject: Re: Talk sub-domain and chat page.
>
>                     Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List
>                     <public-webplatform@w3.org
>                     <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
>                     Resent-Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:57 AM
>
>                     For point one, I haven't seen any Mailing list
>                     discussion about that (probably just lost in gmail
>                     somewhere if it did occur) and I have only heard
>                     some comments in IRC about it, so I have no clue on
>                     the status of an a11y forum.
>
>                     We do have webchat functionality, with my improved
>                     version [1] it includes a freenode webchat embed.
>                     That is why it would be moved off the talk subdomain
>                     onto www. To keep the infrastructure simpler.
>
>                     +1 to remove Discussion. That kind of thing should
>                     be gotten to through the Community page.
>
>
>
>
>                     On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Julee Burdekin
>                     <jburdeki@adobe.com <mailto:jburdeki@adobe.com>> wrote:
>
>                         Hi, Garbee:
>
>                         Please let me know if any of this is incorrect:
>
>                          1. Forums is down, due to technical
>                             difficulties. When we can put it back into
>                             production is unknown. So we won't be
>                             supporting an accessibility forum there as
>                             we previously discussed until further notice.
>                          2. We currently do not have IRC web chat
>                             functionality on this site.
>                          3. Since there's no forums and not web chat,
>                             for now, we're going to take down
>                             talk.webplatform.org
>                             <http://talk.webplatform.org> altogether.
>                          4. Since there's no talk.webplatform.org
>                             <http://talk.webplatform.org>, we should
>                             also remove the global nav "Discussion" from
>                             everywhere:
>                               * Www
>                               * Docs
>                               * Blog
>                               * Project
>
>                         Thanks.
>
>                         Julee
>                         ----------------------------
>                         julee@adobe.com <mailto:julee@adobe.com>
>                         @adobejulee
>
>                         From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com
>                         <mailto:jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>>
>                         Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:44 AM
>                         To: WebPlatform Public List
>                         <public-webplatform@w3.org
>                         <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
>                         Subject: Talk sub-domain and chat page.
>                         Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List
>                         <public-webplatform@w3.org
>                         <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
>                         Resent-Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:44 AM
>
>                         The talk sub-domain no longer has a reason to
>                         stick around. The only thing hosted there is the
>                         defunct chat page. I think we should simply turn
>                         off the talk subdomain and move the chat page
>                         (with improvements [1]) to the primary www
>                         domain. This will reduce the sub-domains that
>                         need to be maintained and simplify management.
>
>                         Any issues going down this road?
>
>                         -Garbee
>
>
>                         [1] http://jonathan.garbee.me/chat/
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 23:52:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:53 UTC