W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > July 2013

Re: JavaScript page naming, round B

From: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:26:39 -0700
To: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>, Julee <julee@adobe.com>
CC: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Janet Swisher <jswisher@mozilla.com>, Webplatform List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE169F0C.88F83%jburdeki@adobe.com>
Hi, PhisktucK: Yes: Object and objects. For global, however, the spec uses lower case for global, maybe because of it's nature.[1] J

[1] http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-15.1
----------------------------
julee@adobe.com
@adobejulee

From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com<mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013 9:21 AM
To: julee <julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>>
Cc: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com<mailto:maxpolk@gmail.com>>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org<mailto:schepers@w3.org>>, Janet Swisher <jswisher@mozilla.com<mailto:jswisher@mozilla.com>>, WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: JavaScript page naming, round B

Global and Object are part of the language (they are constructors/objects). I intentionally left them capitalized.


☆PhistucK


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>> wrote:
Thanks, PhistucK & Max!

I wish we would fix the capitalization on non-language words, so Object, object, global.

But other than that, I think we've discussed most of this issues and that the next step is to get some language experts to review it.

Doug: you mentioned passing this by Julien and Rick Byers? And Janet, you mentioned Dave Brouant?

Regards.

Julee
----------------------------
julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>
@adobejulee





From:  PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com<mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>>
Date:  Thursday, July 25, 2013<tel:2013> 2:22 AM
To:  Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com<mailto:maxpolk@gmail.com>>
Cc:  julee <julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>>, WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
Subject:  Re: JavaScript page naming, round B


I added my proposal -
http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/javascript#Path_rewriting_proposal




☆PhistucK




On Thu, Jul 25, 2013<tel:2013> at 6:26 AM, Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com<mailto:maxpolk@gmail.com>> wrote:







    I finished the two things asked for,
      please have a look at it now:

          http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/javascript

      On 7/13/2013 2:49 PM, Julee wrote:






          Thanks, Max! A couple of things:


1. I would think we do want to doc 5.1.[1]

2. Can we put the hierarchy as you've been working it
              out[2] directly in the document. That way, the reviewers
              we are lining up can get it all from one page.


          Regards.


          Julee


          [1] http://kangax.github.io/es5-compat-table/

            [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webplatform/2013Jul/0002.html


              ----------------------------
              julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>
              @adobejulee







        From:  Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com<mailto:maxpolk@gmail.com>>
          Date:  Saturday, July 13, 2013<tel:2013> 10:12 AM
          To:  julee <julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>>
          Cc:  PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com<mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>>,
          Webplatform List <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
          Subject:  Re: JavaScript page naming, round B





            There was no parent page to the
              javascript/reference, so I just made it javascript:

                  http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/javascript







[...snip...]
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 16:27:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:52 UTC