W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > July 2013

RE: Do we keep prefixes in the title of proprietary features?

From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:56:12 +0000
To: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>, WebPlatform Community <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6c07aa00a6f94c07974e6daf8232178a@BL2PR03MB228.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
I think we said to mark them for deletion if there's no unprefixed version.

Eliot

Sent from my Phone
________________________________
From: Lea Verou<mailto:lea@w3.org>
Sent: 7/19/2013 2:15 PM
To: WebPlatform Community<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>
Subject: Do we keep prefixes in the title of proprietary features?

Hi all,

Recently I've been renaming several -ms- prefixed pages we inherited to their prefixless variants and neutralizing the content. However, there are some features that are completely proprietary: Never were considered for a standard, never supported by other browsers etc, such as [1]. What do we intend to do with such features?

1) Do we keep them and remove the prefix? That they might be proprietary now, but might always be adopted by other browsers and/or specs, and it's better to rename earlier than later.
2) Do we delete them? We don't want to promote proprietary features, right?
3) Do we keep them with the prefix? After all, we want to be as complete as possible.
4) Something else?

Cheers,
Lea

[1]: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/-ms-content-zoom-snap-points

Lea Verou
W3C developer relations
http://w3.org/people/all#lea ? http://lea.verou.me ? @leaverou
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 19:00:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:52 UTC