- From: Chris Mills <cmills@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:04:09 +0000
- To: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
- Cc: Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>, public-webplatform@w3.org
On 29 Jan 2013, at 04:09, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> wrote: > Whoops, sent too soon. > > The guide looks good! One section that might be good to add is where to research the information for your article and how to verify it's correct. We could list known trustworthy sites to use for research (like MDN, caniuse, quirksmode, etc). For example, maybe it says something like, "review existing documentation from other sources and then read the relevant specs. If the sources all agree then you can accept the information as correct, but if they disagree you should do original research or ask for help from more knowledgeable members." Is that reasonable? Added a section!
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 11:04:24 UTC