W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > January 2013

RE: Draft Blog Post on Attribution

From: Craig Goodman <cgoodman@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:01:50 -0800
To: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
CC: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F85F710414401743B5093C1CCDD0F3AD8A98BF4CB9@NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com>
Agree. This is a really nice post, Doug. While it's not about a specific accomplishment, it does get across the underlying spirit of webplatform.org.


-----Original Message-----
From: Eliot Graff [mailto:Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 7:53 AM
To: Doug Schepers; Chris Mills
Cc: Alex Komoroske; public-webplatform@w3.org
Subject: RE: Draft Blog Post on Attribution

I vote for the tweet. We need some heartbeat news.

-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Schepers [mailto:schepers@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 7:38 AM
To: Chris Mills
Cc: Alex Komoroske; Eliot Graff; public-webplatform@w3.org
Subject: Re: Draft Blog Post on Attribution

Hi, folks-

Okay, I plan to publish this blog post today... should I also tweet a link to the post?

On the one hand, I don't think it's particularly compelling or newsworthy, and doesn't even indicate particular progress. On the other hand, we could stand to tweet more, to show signs of life.


On 1/24/13 3:53 AM, Chris Mills wrote:
> +1 … as long as you link the text "a couple of exceptions" to more
> text covering what the exceptions to the licensing conditions are.

Yes. Basically, I extracted that section and put it in http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:External_Attribution#Legal_Note

Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 22:21:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:46 UTC