W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Preliminary CSS Property Priorities

From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:11:02 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPwaZpVww5qKKZeuqyWsNK_wXGkmaKHLCBUggzmtm1cFprL_CQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote:

> Cheers Alex! That was a lot of work yesterday ;-)
>
> Although I did say I might not be finished until Monday - I got up to
> about row 510, but the ones below I didn't get to. I would still like to
> look over these, just to record the specs each one is defined in, and add
> any other properties that may come to light from looking through the specs.
> This shouldn't take me long, but I want to check with you first before
> doing anything that changing the spreadsheet again won't muck up the
> calculations/processing you've applied to it. How is best to proceed here?
>

Go ahead and edit the Manual Data page; you won't mess anything up.

>
> Also, this is likely to not be an exhaustive list of CSS properties. We
> are likely missing a lot of SVG-CSS properties. Do we want to add the
> missing ones in, or should we defer those to a later SVG task? I suggest
> the latter.
>

I agree that the latter is best.


>
> Best,
>
> Chris Mills
> Opera Software, dev.opera.com
> W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org
> Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M)
>
> On 19 Jan 2013, at 02:36, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thanks to some epic work and encycopledic knowledge of CSS by Chris, we
> now have the standardization status for all of the 574 CSS properties in
> our exhaustive list of every CSS property known to man.
> >
> > I've taken a first stab at assigning priorities to them in the main
> tracking sheet:
> https://docs.google.com/a/chromium.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkRs-89PKiZpdE0xdm9Sb1ZvRW1ZRzMtWEdyU0Z4OEE#gid=0
> >
> > Here's the guidelines I tried to apply:
> >       
> >        P0 - Must have right this instant: (often because they're
> important to developers based on MDN's popularity data)
> >        P1 - Necessary to complete milestone
> >        P2 - Normal priority. The majority of these should be done for
> the milestone to be considered finished.
> >        P3 - Not necessary for milestone, should have at some point in
> the future
> >        P4 - Not a priority ever
> > Let me know if you see any articles that you think are too highly
> ranked, and any that aren't ranked high enough.
> >
> > Meanwhile, Mike Sierra is taking a stab at making our representative CSS
> article. Once he's done (and we've discussed it) then we'll work on the
> guide to writing css property docs.
> >
> > --Alex
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 17:12:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:37 UTC