W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Draft Blog Post for W3Conf and Doc Sprint

From: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:09:59 -0800
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
CC: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD22D282.50AC4%jburdeki@adobe.com>
Sounds good to me. J

----------------------------
julee@adobe.com
@adobejulee




-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Organization: W3C
Date: Monday, January 21, 2013 10:13 AM
To: julee <jburdeki@adobe.com>
Cc: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org"
<public-webplatform@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Draft Blog Post for W3Conf and Doc Sprint

>Hi, Julee-
>
>On 1/21/13 12:55 PM, Julee Burdekin wrote:
>> I think there's still confusion. What should the rule of thumb be,
>> Doug? 6 hours after posting to public-webplatform@w3.org or sooner if
>> you get feedback? J
>
>
>My understanding is that once you get approval by one other steward,
>it's okay to publish... otherwise, 6 hours later, whichever comes first.
>
>In this case, I've gotten approval by 2 stewards, but Chris has some
>additional feedback that I'll try to address, as well.
>
>Regards-
>-Doug
Received on Monday, 21 January 2013 19:10:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:37 UTC