W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Proposal for updating links on webplatform.org

From: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:15:08 +0000
Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C59FE05F-94E1-45D7-94A2-F446E3C79579@opera.com>
To: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
Thanks for your input, Garbee - this is good enough justification for me, for not changing the domain ;-) Ok, so that said, I am fine with putting the new discussion text up on http://talk.webplatform.org/



On 15 Jan 2013, at 13:10, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote:

> I think making yet another subdomain is just going to confuse and separate things more than they should be. So, unless we move everything from talk to discuss it is best we just stick with editing the main talk domain page. When you discuss something you are talking about it, so talk still makes plenty of sense. Or we can just go with, "If it isn't broke don't fix it." Take your pick. ;)
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote:
> Ok, so today I have
> 
> * Updated my proposed text for the "Discussion" link, at http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/TEST:discuss. Let me know if you think this is ok, or if it needs any more changes. The only major change was to make the link to the Q&A page much clearer
> * Looked at the page Garbee cited - http://talk.webplatform.org/ - do we think this is a good place to put the Discussion content (i.e., that which "Discussion" links to?) Or should we perhaps change the domains to make the URL more intuitive? So end up with something like http://discuss.webplatform.org/ and http://talk.webplatform.org/qa/ ?
> * Updated the relevant bug to include details of the 5 top level menu items we agreed on yesterday https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20664
> 
> Answers please. In the meantime, I'll start looking into updating the http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Community/Community_Events content to bring it more in line with what we want from a community events page.
> 
> Chris Mills
> Opera Software, dev.opera.com
> W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org
> Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M)
> 
> On 14 Jan 2013, at 18:10, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote:
> 
> > Sold. Thanks all! I'll do some more work on this tomorrow.
> >
> > Chris Mills
> > Opera Software, dev.opera.com
> > W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org
> > Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M)
> >
> > On 14 Jan 2013, at 18:07, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you, Eliot! J
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------
> >> julee@adobe.com
> >> @adobejulee
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
> >> Date: Monday, January 14, 2013 10:03 AM
> >> To: julee <julee@adobe.com>, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
> >> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
> >> Subject: RE: Proposal for updating links on webplatform.org
> >>
> >>>> I agree! So we are back to 5 then. I think that's fine. Better clear than
> >>>> cluttered.
> >>>
> >>> So, for the 5, may I suggest:
> >>>
> >>> *Docs
> >>> *Editing (since we really don't have links to "editors" there)
> >>> * Discussion
> >>> * Blog
> >>> * Community Events (so as not to confuse with API events)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Eliot
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 13:15:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:37 UTC