W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > February 2013

Re: How should we represent the status of a spec?

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:54:25 +0100
Message-ID: <511E3001.30807@w3.org>
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
CC: Julee <julee@adobe.com>, public-webplatform@w3.org
On 15/02/2013 10:00 , Tobie Langel wrote:
> Maybe we should start having a cross-project conversation on the subject.

I'm all for that, but I want to make sure that we don't force ourselves 
to shoehorn all the various ways of representing spec status into a 
single unified one if it turns out not to fit.

Spec status can be different to different users.

Hacker: can I actually use this?
Tester: is there a point in writing tests for this?
Standadista: this feature sucks, do I still have a window to change the 
spec?

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Friday, 15 February 2013 12:54:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:39 UTC