W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > February 2013

Re: An question aside (Re: A categorization/placing problem - event/property pages)

From: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:18:25 +0000
Cc: Julee <julee@adobe.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>, Lance Leonard <Lance.Leonard@microsoft.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2814A41F-15E6-4FD1-86B9-9E83AA9FAF8C@opera.com>
To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>


On 14 Feb 2013, at 19:58, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote:

> Hi Julee!
> 
> I think we'd be safe eliminating the "properties" namespace node - as long as there is no like named other CSS element such as a selector or unit or something. I'm not sure if this is the case or not.
> 
> I'll defer to the experts - like Chris Mills (ha! got you back, Chris!)

;-)

I'm not 100% sure I understand the question, sorry.

we have

css/tutorials
css/properties
css/selectors
css/functions
css/atrules
css/mediaqueries
css/data_types
css/colors

and that's it for now, afaik.
Received on Friday, 15 February 2013 10:19:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:39 UTC