W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > October 2012

Re: JavaScript/ECMAScript Styling and Citation

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:25:56 +0000
To: "eternicode@gmail.com" <eternicode@gmail.com>
CC: "Pete L." <plamoni@gmail.com>, "WebPlatform.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F9981AFB970564408FEB7DFCF62D44084367CF5A@SC-MBX01-4.TheFacebook.com>
On 10/17/12 2:28 PM, "Andrew Rowls" <eternicode@gmail.com> wrote:

>> TBH, It's unenforceable unless there's proper tooling. I'd leave it
>> open and have a page discussing the various styles pros and cons.
>
>Though technically unenforceable (for now?), I think it would still be
>beneficial to have official guidelines to point people to.  A discussion
>on pros and cons is well and good, but flavor-of-the-week style in
>examples would just be confusing.  Better to have a little official
>consistency and something to back it up than to have no consistency.

Fair enough.

>> I strongly favor vi, here.
>
>When did this become about editors? :P

:D

--tobie
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 16:27:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:34 UTC