- From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 07:22:33 -0500
- To: public-webplatform@w3.org
- Message-ID: <50D1B189.3080305@garbee.me>
We are going to have a page (or section) under HTML that will be just for going over obsolete and depreciated things. The core content should remain focused on the latest supported standards and methods. -Garbee On 12/18/2012 9:21 PM, Janet Swisher wrote: > It's also a good idea to document other versions of HTML than 5, if > only so you can indicate what things are deprecated or obsolete. > > On 12/18/12 6:01 PM, Jonathan Garbee wrote: >> Perhaps we should find something to put in the shield. The thing is >> we don't want a standard number there since that would lock the icon >> to that version. The icons (as discussed in the bug report for the >> redesign) should be timeless; locking them to a standard breaks that. >> The navigation icons should be something that we can always reference >> the same, without needing to update with every revision of a spec (no >> matter how long it may take for a revision to occur.) >> >> -Garbee >> >> On 12/18/2012 6:54 PM, Peter Lubbers wrote: >>> I have to say, the badge without the 5 does not make a lot of sense... >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me >>> <mailto:jonathan@garbee.me>> wrote: >>> >>> That is the point. We don't want to "revisit" icons later on. >>> >>> -Garbee >>> >>> On 12/18/2012 5:25 PM, Tobie Langel wrote: >>> > What about we add the 5 now and revisit in 5 years when 6 >>> comes out? >>> > >>> > --tobie >>> > >>> > On 12/18/12 11:22 PM, "Jonathan Garbee" <jonathan@garbee.me >>> <mailto:jonathan@garbee.me>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> It doesn't have the 5 since then for each major version we >>> would need >>> >> new icons. So leaving that out means it is not locked to any >>> specific >>> >> standard version or time period. It just works for future >>> versions as >>> >> well as the current. >>> >> >>> >> Perhaps we could figure something out to fill it in though; >>> I'm not sure >>> >> of what though. >>> >> >>> >> -Garbee >>> >> >>> >> On 12/18/2012 4:56 PM, Lea Verou wrote: >>> >>> Congrats Chris! It looks great!! >>> >>> >>> >>> One minor nitpick: Why is the HTML5 icon hollow? It would >>> look much >>> >>> better if it had the 5 as well, and it would still match the >>> other icons >>> >>> since the JS logo is not hollow either. >>> >>> >>> >>> Lea Verou >>> >>> W3C developer relations >>> >>> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ? http://lea.verou.me ? @leaverou >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Dec 18, 2012, at 12:06, Chris Mills wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Seb has finished the new icons, and I've implemented the >>> new WPD main >>> >>>> page! >>> >>>> >>> >>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Main_Page >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Let me know what you think. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I'm now gonna go ahead and implement the main topic landing >>> pages, >>> >>>> after which we can really start drilling down into the IA >>> of different >>> >>>> specific sections and get things moving. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Chris Mills >>> >>>> Opera Software, dev.opera.com <http://dev.opera.com> >>> >>>> W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org >>> <http://webplatform.org> >>> >>>> Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" >>> (http://goo.gl/AKf9M) >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Janet Swisher <mailto:jREMOVEswisher@mozilla.com> > Mozilla Developer Network <https://developer.mozilla.org> > Technical Writer/Community Steward
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2012 12:23:15 UTC