W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > December 2012

Re: We have a new front page

From: Peter Lubbers <peterlubbers@google.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:18:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CACCmPHzPcWDL1td=FFqdhfPs-Hhc-KFVF5vyHUKRKigpN_FELw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
In that case I suggest going with a different icon altogether.



On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote:

>  Perhaps we should find something to put in the shield. The thing is we
> don't want a standard number there since that would lock the icon to that
> version. The icons (as discussed in the bug report for the redesign) should
> be timeless; locking them to a standard breaks that. The navigation icons
> should be something that we can always reference the same, without needing
> to update with every revision of a spec (no matter how long it may take for
> a revision to occur.)
>
> -Garbee
>
>
> On 12/18/2012 6:54 PM, Peter Lubbers wrote:
>
>  I have to say, the badge without the 5 does not make a lot of sense...
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>wrote:
>
>> That is the point. We don't want to "revisit" icons later on.
>>
>> -Garbee
>>
>> On 12/18/2012 5:25 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
>> > What about we add the 5 now and revisit in 5 years when 6 comes out?
>> >
>> > --tobie
>> >
>> > On 12/18/12 11:22 PM, "Jonathan Garbee" <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote:
>> >
>> >> It doesn't have the 5 since then for each major version we would need
>> >> new icons. So leaving that out means it is not locked to any specific
>> >> standard version or time period. It just works for future versions as
>> >> well as the current.
>> >>
>> >> Perhaps we could figure something out to fill it in though; I'm not
>> sure
>> >> of what though.
>> >>
>> >> -Garbee
>> >>
>> >> On 12/18/2012 4:56 PM, Lea Verou wrote:
>> >>> Congrats Chris! It looks great!!
>> >>>
>> >>> One minor nitpick: Why is the HTML5 icon hollow? It would look much
>> >>> better if it had the 5 as well, and it would still match the other
>> icons
>> >>> since the JS logo is not hollow either.
>> >>>
>> >>> Lea Verou
>> >>> W3C developer relations
>> >>> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ? http://lea.verou.me ? @leaverou
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Dec 18, 2012, at 12:06, Chris Mills wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Seb has finished the new icons, and I've implemented the new WPD main
>> >>>> page!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Main_Page
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Let me know what you think.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'm now gonna go ahead and implement the main topic landing pages,
>> >>>> after which we can really start drilling down into the IA of
>> different
>> >>>> specific sections and get things moving.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Chris Mills
>> >>>> Opera Software, dev.opera.com
>> >>>> W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org
>> >>>> Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2012 00:18:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:36 UTC