W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > December 2012

Re: Proposal for updating links on webplatform.org

From: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:34:20 +0000
Cc: public-webplatform@w3.org
Message-Id: <99C2D364-E2D1-4B5D-81A2-B4724204CEF4@opera.com>
To: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>

On 12 Dec 2012, at 11:15, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote:

> Well, I'd love to see what is linked to in that bug report to see what was being thought of before. The link (along with a few other links in the tracker) go to a locked resource. Either way, I think points two and three for what should be on the About page should be combined; the site was made because of the philosophy so there really is no need to create more fluff. I really think the intro video did a great job of getting the point across, the real question is how many people watched it. That video would be a good base of information to start with for building the page I think.
> 

I'm happy to have a look at the video, to make sure our about page complements and doesn't contradict the video. But I think what I've already written is ok (others agreed, too.)

> The bug report is simply to remove the extra "More" link altogether since it is redundant (and confusing.) The second "point" I'm assuming is the last question which actually shouldn't have been sent, that was my mind working while I typed ;) . What it *meant* though is "Should any navigational element have multiple links to the same place with different names?" since it seems like a bad way to do things to me.
> 

Ah, ok. This makes sense now then! Thanks for the clarification, and yes, I agree.

> On 12/11/2012 1:49 AM, Chris Mills wrote:
>> 
>> On 7 Dec 2012, at 12:28, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote:
>> 
>>> Well, there should be an "about" page [1] since that issue has been sitting for quite a while.  That should be the "philosophy" if there is to be a page for it.
>> So, adding an "About/philosophy" page to the site, and changing one of the links in the main navigation to "About" - yup, I think this is definitely a good idea.
>> 
>> I am happy to draft this. What do we need on there?
>> 
>> 1. More detail about what webplatform is
>> 2. Why the site was created
>> 3. Philosophy behind it
>> 
>> Anything else?
>> 
>>> The more link also needs to go [2] since it is a UX nightmare. There is no reason to have multiple links go to the same area in the same nav menu with different names. Should it ever have a different name in any navigation item?
>> Sorry - I read the bug, but I don't know what other page you are suggesting adding here - it is as if a part of the explanation on the bug is missing? Can you elaborate on this second point?
>> 
>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19557
>> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2012 11:34:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:36 UTC