- From: Kostas Koukopoulos <kk@longaccess.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:53:04 +0300
- To: public-webpayments@w3.org
Hello, In the last draft of the HTTP-signatures specification the BNF grammar which described the signature header has been removed (it was thought to be unecessary I believe). However, from reading the spec I get the impression that there is no longer any restriction on the order of the "auth-param" parameters in the header. This is not necessarily a bad thing, although it could be clarified more strongly. My question however is another, because this seems to create a discrepancy with the last HTTP-signature-nonce specification which includes a BNF grammar that lists the parameters in a specific order. So, what is the view of the group re. the HTTP-signature-nonces spec? Thanks, Konstantinos -- Konstantinos Koukopoulos (@ The Long Access Company) <kk@longaccess.com> landline: +302117706924 mobile:: +306948630066 Your Data. Safe. For Long.
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 13:35:14 UTC