Re: Finalizing Reservation schemas for schema.org

I added the Web Schemas Task Force (of the W3C Semantic Web Interest Group)
to the "Dependencies or Liaisons" section of the WPCG Charter
https://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/wiki/WebPaymentsCommunityGroupCharterProposal#Dependencies_or_Liaisons

(Note the last line of our vote-pending charter: "Changes to the
Dependencies and Liasons list does not constitute an amendment to the
charter that requires a rechartering vote."

Joseph Potvin


On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Martin Hepp <
martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:

> Yes, I think that now would be the time for the WG to propose a payments
> extension to schema.org, at least covering traditional payment
> transactions.
>
> Martin
>
> On Jan 28, 2014, at 4:48 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>
> > I find this discussion having relevance to work here in Web Paymetns CG.
> Very likely people may want to use Web Payments for Transactions related to
> all those Reservations!
> >
> > I would really like that people who use Schema.org can very easily use
> Web Payments as well :)
> >
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: Finalizing Reservation schemas for schema.org
> > Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:35:25 +0000
> > Resent-From: public-vocabs@w3.org
> > Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:34:29 +0100
> > From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
> > To: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
> > CC: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, PublicVocabs <
> public-vocabs@w3.org>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>
> >> 2. Price information
> >> If price and priceCurreny are only used to indicated what was charged
> for the ticket (in the sense of a payment transaction), it can stay as it
> is.
> >> But if the intended use is also to indicate offers to tickets, the new
> http://schema.org/priceSpecification property should be used.
> >>
> >> This done properly will allow for very powerful use-cases like
> >>
> >> "An offer for a family ticket for the Bryan Adams concert at the
> Verizon Wireless Amphitheatre for 1-2 adults and 0-2 kids aged 0-6 years"
> >>
> >> with very little additional elements. See
> http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/tio/ns#family_example.
> >>
> >> Conclusion: If the properties are only used for transactions, it can
> stay as it is.
> >>
> >>
> >> <vth> The intention is to record what the person paid for the ticket in
> 'price'. I assume an offer price would be part of a
> http://schema.org/Offer. Perhaps the price property should be changed to
> 'pricePaid' or similar to clarify the difference.
> >> </vth>
> >
> > Yes, pricePaid would be perfectly fine, and then maybe change the range
> from Number to Number OR PriceSpecification, so people could use the more
> advanced modeling of that type (see also the ongoing discussion on tax
> information; we would then not need to duplicate efforts for modeling tax
> information).
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> martin hepp
> e-business & web science research group
> universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
>
> e-mail:  hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
> phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
> fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
> www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
>          http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
> skype:   mfhepp
> twitter: mfhepp
>
> Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
> =================================================================
> * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Joseph Potvin
Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations
The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman
http://www.projectmanagementhotel.com/projects/opman-portfolio
jpotvin@opman.ca
Mobile: 819-593-5983
LinkedIn (Google short URL): http://goo.gl/Ssp56