Re: Categorized use cases updated w/ comments

hey, :)

i added the use case i suggested:
https://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/wiki/UseCases#Unclassified.2FUnreviewed

> Use Case: When a customer intends to make a payment, it is possible to
pick a payment processor trusted by the merchant as an intermediate proxy
for a payment processor not trusted by the merchant.

am i wrong in thinking that the current use cases only support a handful of
mega payment processors? for example, if 1000 people band together and
create a cooperative payment processor, how will they ever be able to use
it if they are unknown to nearly all merchants?

cheers,
Michael
http://dinosaur.is#i


On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've made a pass through all comments on all use cases that were put
> forward for discussion over a week ago and integrated all +0s and -1s
> into the list of categorized use cases:
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/wiki/CategorizedWebPaymentsUseCases
>
> We'll be discussing all of these comments on the telecon tomorrow, so
> please make sure to at least glance through them before the call.
>
> -- manu
>
> PS: There is a good chance that I missed a comment or two, so please
> mention it if I did (or better, add it directly to the wiki page).
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments
> http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
>
>