- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:56:57 -0400
- To: public-webpayments@w3.org
On 04/19/2014 10:49 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > Or is there a downside to those types that I'm just completely blind > to? > > I would be quite happy to use any of those types. But the "range" > of nonce is limited to string. So if I did so, I would be violating > the ontology. I wouldn't put too much authority into the current vocabulary. If the range of nonce in the Security vocabulary is preventing you from getting something useful done, we should probably change the acceptable ranges for nonce. Perhaps we should expand it to allow xsd:string, xsd:base64, and xsd:hexBinary. Would that work for you, Melvin? -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 00:57:32 UTC