Re: Range of Security : Nonce

On 19 April 2014 19:09, Herbert Snorrason <odin@anarchism.is> wrote:

> On 19/04/14 14:49, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> > I would be quite happy to use any of those types.  But the "range" of
> nonce
> > is limited to string.  So if I did so, I would be violating the ontology.
> Yes, I'm sorry if I was unclear; what I meant was that it would be
> better to replace xsd:string with either of the binary types than with
> an integer type.
>

Yes, that makes sense, thanks for the clarification.

I had a chat on IRC about this, and Im going to switch from unsignedInt to
hexBinary.  The schema will be adjusted to allow this.


>
> With greetings,
>   Herbert Snorrason
>
>
>