- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 17:34:49 -0500
- To: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- CC: Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
On 12/17/2013 06:50 AM, Renato Iannella wrote: > [Note, I am Chair of the W3C ODRL Community Group] Hi Renato, we meet again. :) Thanks for chiming in on this thread. > Firstly, ODRL is a policy expression language (originally based on > rights) and does not imply any enforcement mechanisms. We have > recently published the ODRL Ontology [1] for greater support in the > Semantic Web community. We looked at ODRL a while ago and it seemed compatible w/ what we're doing here. We didn't look into it much past there since it seemed like ODRL would fit nicely w/ a number of the specs we're working on. > ODRL is heavily based on identifiers, so if a financial Transaction > id is used, then ODRL can express policy/rules about that "asset". There are identifiers for assets (things being sold), listings (terms under which things are sold), and transactions. ODRL could apply to each of those fairly easily, IIRC. > The ODRL community would be happy to look into examples for web > payments. We'd love to collaborate with the ODRL community on this, since that's where a lot of this policy expression expertise lives. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Worlds First Web Payments Workshop http://www.w3.org/2013/10/payments/
Received on Monday, 30 December 2013 22:35:12 UTC