Re: [goodrelations] GoodRelations and Web Payments (aka. Payswarm)

On 28 December 2013 18:20, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>wrote:

> I've just watched a video by Manu Sporny on generating and registering
> Asset & Listing for Web Payments: http://youtu.be/n5KBw7K65hg
>
> I tried searching http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org for terms
> *asset*, *listing* with no results and payswarm giving just two:
> * http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Changelog/20110401
> * http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Events/ISWC2012
>
> I wonder if some way of aligning between Web Payments and GoodRelations
> terms exists?
>
> https://web-payments.org/specs/source/vocabs/payswarm
> http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1.html
>
> I also notice gr:PaySwarm as subclass of gr:PaymentMethod in range of
> gr:acceptedPaymentMethods
>
> Wouldn't at least those terms somehow map to each other:
> gr:ProductOrService <-> payswarm:Asset
> gr:Offering <-> payswarm:Listing
>

One slight difference is that, afaik, GR uses a 3 letter ISO for currency,
whereas web payments also allows anyURI, which allows things like virtual
currencies to be part of a system.

So depending on your use cases, it might be that one vocab, is easier to
work with than another.  Of course, the beauty of the semantic web is that
you can mix and match to meet your needs.


>
> GoodRelations terms already got included in schema.org and maybe Web
> Payments could somehow reuse/extend them:
> http://schema.org/Product
> http://schema.org/Offer | http://schema.org/Demand
>
> Otherwise publishers may need to mark things as both?
> Product & Asset
> Offer & Listing
>
> Thanks for help with clarifying it!
>
> _______________________________________________
> goodrelations mailing list
> goodrelations@ebusiness-unibw.org
> http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations
>