public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from May 2019 by author

Adrian Hope-Bailie

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] PaymentRequest - Bluetooth connector (#865) (Friday, 3 May)

Anders Rundgren

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] PaymentRequest - Bluetooth connector (#865) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] PaymentRequest - Bluetooth connector (#865) (Friday, 3 May)

chaals

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Don't redact phone number from billingAddress (#80) (Friday, 10 May)

Danyao Wang

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Give AddressInit's members defaults (#852) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Thursday, 2 May)

Felipe Nascimento de Moura

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add quantity prop to items (#861) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add quantity prop to items (#861) (Wednesday, 29 May)

ianbjacobs

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] chore: Prepare PR branch (#860) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Don't redact phone number from billingAddress (#80) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Show example of .complete("unknown") (#584) (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CANIUSE for download-free/bundled Payment Methods (#338) (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CANIUSE for download-free/bundled Payment Methods (#338) (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Wednesday, 8 May)
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] remove addressLine from redactList (#79) (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CANIUSE for download-free/bundled Payment Methods (#338) (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] PaymentRequest - Bluetooth connector (#865) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] PaymentRequest - Bluetooth connector (#865) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Wednesday, 1 May)

Jinho Bang

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#339) (Wednesday, 22 May)

kyawzan

• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Fixed example typos above.ToFix (#81) (Sunday, 12 May)

Marcos Cáceres

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] chore: Prepare PR branch (#860) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#339) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• [w3c/payment-handler] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#339) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Don't redact phone number from billingAddress (#80) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Fixed example typos above.ToFix (#81) (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CANIUSE for download-free/bundled Payment Methods (#338) (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CANIUSE for download-free/bundled Payment Methods (#338) (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Don't redact phone number from billingAddress (#80) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Don't redact phone number from billingAddress (#80) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Don't redact phone number from billingAddress (#80) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] remove addressLine from redactList (#79) (Friday, 10 May)
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Don't redact phone number from billingAddress (#80) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] remove addressLine from redactList (#79) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] remove addressLine from redactList (#79) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Show example of .complete("unknown") (#584) (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Sunday, 5 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Give AddressInit's members defaults (#852) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Spec hasEnrolledInstrument (#830) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Thursday, 2 May)

Nick Telford-Reed

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Don't redact phone number from billingAddress (#80) (Monday, 13 May)

richardPAG

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CANIUSE for download-free/bundled Payment Methods (#338) (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CANIUSE for download-free/bundled Payment Methods (#338) (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CANIUSE for download-free/bundled Payment Methods (#338) (Thursday, 9 May)
• [w3c/payment-handler] CANIUSE for download-free/bundled Payment Methods (#338) (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Saturday, 4 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Wednesday, 1 May)

Rouslan Solomakhin

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] fix: don't redact addressLine from billingAddress (#77) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Why does a Payment App need to see the line items? (#91) (Thursday, 2 May)

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 2019 14:18:14 UTC