Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should we validate nonsense payer error properties? (#793)

> I thought it would be better to throw an exception to give developers useful information and predictable code but my thought was changed after your comment [1].

I'm open to revising this assumption, because the merchant might be confused as to why the user is not fixing something the user can't fix (e.g., "fix your email!")... and the user might be wondering why retrying the payment is failing ("I can't fix my email, you dummy! you never asked for it so the browser doesn't let me!").

  


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/793#issuecomment-426535832