Re: [w3c/payment-request] Applying "Detached" JWS Signatures to PaymentRequest (#714)

@cyberphone wrote:

> It will not happen because the cost is huge and the need is not that big. The IETF JSON WG wouldn't accept such a proposal.

I'm confused. It seems that we (you) can't convince the appropriate working group to solve the problem, therefore we (you) feel the need to define workarounds everywhere downstream from the right place to solve the problem. That doesn't strike me as an effective or efficient approach. Am I missing something?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/714#issuecomment-390689562

Received on Monday, 21 May 2018 15:30:30 UTC