Re: [w3c/payment-request] Fine grained error recovery for fields (#647)

LGTM! Thanks for getting back to this so quickly!

I only have two nits:
* I'm not sure any UAs plan to expose the underlying `languageCode` so I'm not sure how useful an error message for it would be but I think it's fine to be consistent and support errors on all fields in the shipping address.
* Tangent: I'd rather we fixed the misnomer of `addressLine` => `addressLines` everywhere rather than continuing to propagate it e.g. support both in the code already shipped in UAs treating the old name as an alias to the new name.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/647#issuecomment-386112807

Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2018 20:37:59 UTC