Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Edits regarding ordering based on 7 Dec WG teleconf (#242) from Manu Sporny on 2018-01-07 (public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from January 2018)

From: Manu Sporny <notifications@github.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2018 16:36:30 +0000 (UTC)
To: w3c/payment-handler <payment-handler@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/payment-handler/pull/242/c355834902@github.com>

I'm fine w/ compromising on: https://github.com/w3c/payment-handler/pull/242/commits/a91db521a3ba8d7a36cb9c50f484e51d2838943b

@ianbjacobs wrote:
> Are there specific rules (analogous to PCI DSS) that you have in mind?

Yes, we could point to regulations such as those set the Robinson–Patman Act of 1936 (Title 15 U.S.C. § 13): https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/13 or in the EU, Articles 101 to 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_101_of_the_Treaty_on_the_Functioning_of_the_European_Union https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_102_of_the_Treaty_on_the_Functioning_of_the_European_Union ... again, non-normative text and just enough of it to give a heads-up to developers that may not be aware of the landscape.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/payment-handler/pull/242#issuecomment-355834902

Received on Sunday, 7 January 2018 16:37:03 UTC