Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] How are empty supported* fields to be interpreted? (#48)

Hi @rvm4,

As mentioned on today's call, part of the answer lies in the algorithms of the spec. See, for example: 

8.2 Steps to check if an instrument is supported 
https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-methods-tokenization/index.html#steps-to-check-if-an-instrument-is-supported

I adapted that text from Basic Card, but it has not been well-reviewed and may need work. 

It currently says:
  If types is empty and networks is empty, return true. 

It might need to say:
  If types is empty and networks is empty and cryptograms is empty, return true. 

I am inclined to make that change (for consistency with types and networks). Comments welcome!

Ian



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization/issues/48#issuecomment-412936938

Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2018 16:40:56 UTC