Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Ability to set default instrument for given handler (#173)

Hi @marcoscaceres,

Thanks for the input on this issue. 

I agree with you that PR API is the top priority, but there are also people interested in ensuring that Web-based payment apps continue to advance, even if it's slow, and even if we have to make changes. 

Here are some ideas:

* Are there other people (e.g,. from Mozilla) who may not be actively implementing or testing PR API and who are interested in helping us with Payment Handler, or at least keeping an eye on it?
* We are actively seeking more testing resources for PR API. If it would be useful to you, I am happy to schedule a regular slot where, either by phone or chat or otherwise, we do testing project management to make sure we have targets and are reaching them.

Ian

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/payment-handler/issues/173#issuecomment-317727109