Re: [w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api] payment-manifest.json and canHandle function (#83)

@adamroach,

Regarding payment app manifest files not being required (at this time), the spec in section 4.4 says: "This specification does not require that the payment manifest be independently addressable (e.g., in a file on the Web)."

(That is a recent edit.)

It sounds like Rouslan and Adam are in agreement and no change is required to canHandle() from their perspective. 

Conor, do you think we can do more in the spec to make clear that no file is (currently) required? 

(Also, we realized today that the registration example uses quotes in consistently; we will remove those quotation marks in the next round of edits.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/83#issuecomment-273227818

Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 16:55:17 UTC