Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] feat: put request id in details dictionary (#426) from Marcos Cáceres on 2017-02-23 (public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from February 2017)

From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:27:34 -0800
To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/426/c281898511@github.com>

Question: do we want an internal slot for the [id] for when it's copied over from Request to Response? Can it be forged if the attribute value is just copied over? I guess having the internal slot is nicer - but I don't have an strong opinion.  

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/426#issuecomment-281898511

Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 05:32:37 UTC