Re: [w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api] Proposed changes for #95 (and #96) (#104)

bentian commented on this pull request.



> +        provide a name and icon for such a group (e.g., to group together
+        "business account" payment instruments separately from "personal
+        account" payment instruments). The use of this grouping mechanism
+        by payment apps is completley optional. If payment apps use this
+        grouping mechanism, then matching payment options that do not appear
+        in any groups should still be presented to users by the browser for
+        selection.
+      </dd>
+    </dl>
+  </section>
+  <section id="payment-options">
+  <h2>
+    <a>PaymentOptions</a> interface
+  </h2>
+      <pre id="payment-app-manager-idl" class="idl">
+      interface PaymentOptions {

The interface name conflicts with [PaymentOptions dictionary](https://w3c.github.io/browser-payment-api/#paymentoptions-dictionary). May this get confusing?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/pull/104#pullrequestreview-22901104

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2017 08:45:16 UTC