Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] The "if d is resolved" section of updateWith needs to be more explicit about how it gets a PaymentDetails dictionary (#349)

I'll use promises guide for now. Using the per-instance `.then` and not handling errors seems bad; I don't think perform steps once a promise is settled is really up to snuff yet. Although we (I) do indeed need to add better promise primitives to Web IDL.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/349#issuecomment-266802638

Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:23:48 UTC