- From: Rouslan Solomakhin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:31:21 -0800
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 20:32:21 UTC
> Do browser vendors think this would make sense to treat this like a payment method, albeit special? Or would that be inefficient, confusing, etc.? I don't think that we should be adding either the `"payee-legacy"` payment method or the `"enableLegacyCheckout"` option. If a merchant was using the services of https://a-payment-service.com, then `"https://a-payment-service.com"` should become a payment to participate in the ecosystem. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/365#issuecomment-266544008
Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 20:32:21 UTC