RE: [use_cases] Web Payments Use Cases - Organized by Phases

Oops, thanks Ian - theoretically I should have known that....:-)



* katie *
 
Katie Haritos-Shea 
Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
 
Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:06 PM
To: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
Cc: Web Payments IG
Subject: Re: [use_cases] Web Payments Use Cases - Organized by Phases


> On Mar 10, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Ian,
> 
> Quick suggestion for the Introduction. While we all know that the Web Platform strives to achieve interoperability (as opposed to proprietary) technologies - I am not sure that many in the financial services sector necessarily do - so I think we should include an implication by adding *interoperable* to one of these two sentences from the opening paragraph:
> 
> 1. Since the Web is ubiquitous, strengthening support for *interoperable* payments has the potential to create new opportunities for businesses and customers.
> 
> 2. Although we are seeing innovation in payment services, the lack of *interoperable* Web standards makes it more difficult to adapt to new payment approaches or integrate new payment providers.
> 
> Thoughts?

The text you are referring to comes from the existing use cases document (I just pasted into my experiment). For the moment I don’t plan to fork the intro from the main document text. Manu, please consider Katie's comment as input to the main document.

Meanwhile: +1 to your proposal.

Ian

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447

Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 18:14:48 UTC