- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:47:18 -0400
- To: public-webpayments-ig@w3.org
On 06/23/2015 03:11 PM, Dave Raggett wrote: > In my talk [1], I was careful to avoid the term wallet given that > people differ in what they think it means, and instead referred to > the roles for specific tasks, e.g. selection agent, receipt agent and > payment instrument. For V1, we can ignore the receipt agent, and > just talk about the selection agent and payment instrument. We can > leave “wallet” until later, and I expect that when we want to allow > one agent to performs multiple roles, then we want indeed want to try > to use the term wallet for such agents. +1, revisiting the "wallet" terminology debate feels like it'll prevent us from getting more pressing things done. While the "______ agent" terminology is a bit awkward to use, I have a better idea of what it means than "wallet". -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2015 19:47:41 UTC