- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:18:48 -0400
- To: public-webpayments-ig@w3.org
On 07/06/2015 09:30 AM, Joerg.Heuer@telekom.de wrote: > Would it make sense to add the word ‘recurring’ somewhere in the > first scenario? Done. https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-ig/commit/1b104c84c9bbc00ca3781317fe3e6431489bedbd#diff-69ba5032c87a9348b1e27b6faf8217abR2578 > Also one more remark on the direct debit scenario: It seems wise to > me to make a connection between the authentication step and the > receipt being sent. (Usually you would expect a kind of credential > issued by a bank being used for authentication.) This credential (or > representation) would also be the receiver address of the receipt. > Otherwise – how would you know where to send the receipt to? Done, but please check the language to see if it accomplishes what you wanted: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-ig/commit/3b70e3ef13bf5288a19ce746517d360a81421fa8 -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2015 04:19:13 UTC