Re: Merchants, Mobile Operators, Banks, Browser Makers: Help us prioritize the Interest Group's work

I'd second David's suggestion that there should be a group representing all
of the payment service providers that aren't banks. There were enough
represented in NYC (PayGate, Dwolla, Visa etc spring to mind) and we have
participation from Alipay now.

@Mountie/Kepeng: Is this a stakeholder group you could co-ordinate?



On 19 August 2015 at 19:50, David Jackson <david.dj.jackson@oracle.com>
wrote:

> Understood.  Thanks for the remediation ...
>
> --
> David Jackson | Senior Director Financial Services
> Mobile: +16145601237 | VOIP: +16144656654
> Oracle Global Industry Solutions Group
> New York City | Columbus, Ohio
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 1:50 PM
> To: David Jackson
> Cc: Web Payments IG
> Subject: Re: Merchants, Mobile Operators, Banks, Browser Makers: Help us
> prioritize the Interest Group's work
>
>
> > On Aug 19, 2015, at 12:47 PM, David Jackson <david.dj.jackson@oracle.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Would eCommerce software platform providers be covered in these
> > stakeholder groups? My thinking is that there in web commerce software
> > vendors to understand their role in payments processing on-behalf of
> > others …
>
> I would like the groups to self-organize. I pitched a few that came to
> mind to start the conversation. By all means the participants should
> organize in a way that allows them to create the clearest statement of
> interests and priorities.
>
> Of course one organization could be in multiple groups.
>
> Ian
>
> >
> > --
> > David Jackson | Senior Director Financial Services
> > Mobile: +16145601237 | VOIP: +16144656654 Oracle Global Industry
> > Solutions Group New York City | Columbus, Ohio
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 1:43 PM
> > To: Web Payments IG
> > Subject: Merchants, Mobile Operators, Banks, Browser Makers: Help us
> > prioritize the Interest Group's work
> >
> > Hi Web Payments IG,
> >
> > Here’s an idea for helping to prioritize the IG’s work, and for building
> (part of) the agenda for the October face-to-face meeting:
> > we organize “stakeholder groups” to see whether there are consensus
> views on stakeholder priorities. Here are the groups that come to mind for
> me (but feel free to expand):
> >
> >       - Merchants
> >       - Mobile operators
> >       - Banks
> >       - Browser makers
> >
> > Here’s a plan for getting written perspectives by Sapporo:
> >
> > * This week: People who are interested developing “priorities” from a
> stakeholder perspective raise their hands on this list.
> >
> > * Week of 24 August: We organize a 30-minute call with those interested
> to start the discussion, and in that call we find
> >    a champion for that group. The champion continues discussions with
> the group (which can also happen on this mailing list
> >    if people wish) to develop the perspectives. Also, champions
> can/should create pages in our wiki [1] for notes and consensus
> >    points.
> >
> > * Week of 5 September: We hear from each champion on the 5 September
> call, what the highlights are. We provide feedback,
> >   that the champions incorporate into their materials. Each group then
> continues to flesh out its perspectives as far as it needs
> >   in the wiki.
> >
> > * At the face-to-face meeting we hear from each stakeholder group as
> part of determining next priorities for the IG.
> >
> > David, let’s discuss this at our 24 August call.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > [1] https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Main_Page
> > --
> > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> > Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
>
>
>
>
>