The table 'EC Extension table' [1] is missing a row defining the semantics of annotation(p v) for v a literal I suspect the desired interpretation is {x \in R | <x, S(v)> \in ER(p)} [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/direct.html#3.2 -- Dave Turner Cube T400, HP Labs Bristol, Filton Road, Bristol BS34 8QZ davidt@hp.com +44 117 3129104 (Work) +44 7962 811627 (Mobile) Hewlett-Packard Limited. Registered No: 690597 England Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HNReceived on Thursday, 5 April 2007 09:28:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:16 GMT