Re: Comments & bugs on the abstract syntax and its sourceforge implementation

Hi. I just discovered your message of May 2005.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2005May/0005.html

Did you ever get a response? I don't see one. Terribly sorry about that.

As far as I can tell, your comments are about some OWLAPI sourceforge
project; I'm not familiar with it. I don't see a pointer in your
message.
Google nominates http://sourceforge.net/projects/owlapi but it
seems to be down at the moment. They seem to have a owlapi-developer
mailing list. Have you tried that?

You might also try the public-owl-dev mailing list hosted by W3C.
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-dev/

If there's anything in your comment about the OWL specification
documents per se, please clarify.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Friday, 18 August 2006 18:23:30 UTC