W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webont-comments@w3.org > May 2005

Re: barenames and Schema Component Designators

From: Mary Holstege <holstege@mathling.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:33:55 -0700
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.sqohxhe6pwddar@holstege.mathling.com>

On Mon, 02 May 2005 11:59:29 -0700, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 11:30 -0700, Mary Holstege wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> In discussing your comment[1] the XML Schema WG realized
>> that we need some clarification on what the actual use case
>> is before decided what action to take.
>>
>> The DAML+OIL example you cite is using barenames with
>> a schema document as a left hand side to refer to simple
>> types in a schema with no target namespace.
>
> I'm not sure if the lack of a target namespace was on purpose.

So, just to be super clear: #foo:bar is not a barename, true?

Thank you for the rest of your clarifications; that is
most helpful.

Cheers

//Mary
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 00:34:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:29 GMT