Re: barenames and Schema Component Designators

On Mon, 02 May 2005 11:59:29 -0700, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 11:30 -0700, Mary Holstege wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> In discussing your comment[1] the XML Schema WG realized
>> that we need some clarification on what the actual use case
>> is before decided what action to take.
>>
>> The DAML+OIL example you cite is using barenames with
>> a schema document as a left hand side to refer to simple
>> types in a schema with no target namespace.
>
> I'm not sure if the lack of a target namespace was on purpose.

So, just to be super clear: #foo:bar is not a barename, true?

Thank you for the rest of your clarifications; that is
most helpful.

Cheers

//Mary