W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webont-comments@w3.org > January 2004

Re: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, another comment/question

From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:11:38 -0800
Message-ID: <4008376A.5040208@ksl.stanford.edu>
To: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org

you are correct .   section 4 discusses features that are added in OWL 
DL and OWL Full and both of these languages use the same vocabulary.

deborah

Benjamin Nowack wrote:

>
>OWL Web Ontology Language Overview" document[1]:
>
>Section 4. Incremental Language Description of 
>OWL DL and OWL FULL:
><snip>
>disjointWith: OWL Full allows the statement that
>classes are disjoint.
></snip>
>
>doesn't this apply to OWL DL as well?
>
>benjamin
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
>
>______________________________
>Benjamin Nowack
>bnowack@appmosphere.com
>
>Kruppstrasse 82-100
>45145 Essen, Germany
>
>
>  
>

-- 
 Deborah L. McGuinness 
 Knowledge Systems Laboratory 
 353 Serra Mall
 Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241 
 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020 
 email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu
 URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/index.html 
 (voice) 650 723 9770    (stanford fax) 650 725 5850   (computer fax)  801 705 0941
Received on Friday, 16 January 2004 14:13:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:29 GMT